Thomas Lazur

Thomas developed a specialism in energy related cases in his first few years of practice after being instructed as sole counsel in an ICC arbitration concerning the final account for a flue gas desulphurisation project in Eastern Europe. After a series of similar cases his work expanded into the oil and gas industry.

He has extensive experience in disputes concerning the construction of vessels used in offshore oil production, works to offshore drilling rigs and associated equipment, and oil and gas processing facilities. He has represented shipbuilders, purchasers and owners dealing with disputes over payment for additional work, termination, delays to delivery, and defects.

His experience extends to a significant range of energy production facilities including the decommissioning of nuclear power stations, traditional coal and gas fired power stations, and several alternative energy facilities including solar, wind, and energy from waste.

Most recently he represented the contractor in a month-long arbitration hearing to determine issues arising from the concurrent construction of three energy from waste facilities in the UK.

In addition to the legal issues that arise out of these cases, he particularly enjoys the technical and engineering issues that have been central to the claims.

Thomas’ father worked as an engineer in the oil and gas industry for over 50 years, specialising in turbomachinery used in offshore drilling operations. Having found it a hard career with relatively little reward, he advised Thomas to “never become an engineer”. Following that advice, Thomas set out on a path firmly away from science. It is something of a family joke that, despite his best efforts, he has developed a practice in the same industry.

The bulk of his work in this area has concerned offshore drilling platforms including the construction of new vessels and the refurbishment and extension of existing oil production facilities. His work has involved projects throughout the world including China, Korea, Nigeria, the Gulf of Mexico, and the North Sea.

Thomas is familiar with most of the standard forms used in the industry and is a contributing author to Keating on Offshore Construction and Marine Engineering Contracts.

After publishing his article on the application of the prevention principle in shipbuilding disputes, he was instructed to argue that the prevention principle should be applied under a SAJ based contract. The tribunal agreed, allowing his client to argue that the contract was wrongfully terminated.

He is regularly instructed as junior to silks from other chambers where there are construction related issues, such as defective works and delays, which may be unfamiliar to general commercial practitioners.

He also has significant experience in professional negligence claims arising out of these projects including claims arising out of FEED and EPC contracts associated with the development of existing production facilities. The technical issues he has covered include the floating dynamics of an offloading buoy, the defective design of a slug suppression system, defects in a blowout preventer and its management system, and pitting to propellers caused by a defective design.

He was also fortunate to be instructed on a dispute concerning the construction of Sailing Yacht A – the largest yacht ever built.

Thomas has extensive experience in a range of construction disputes from domestic disputes to some of the largest projects in the world. His work covers all aspects of construction disputes including adjudication proceedings and enforcement, advice on payment issues, professional negligence actions, defects, and final account claims. He has been involved as both claimant and defendant in a number of cladding claims, including claims under the Building Safety Act 2022. He has advised on contractual issues arising out of all standard forms of building contract and the bespoke amendments that are often made. He is a contributing author for Keating on Construction Contracts.

He is familiar with all procedural issues that typically arise out of construction and engineering claims including adjudication enforcement proceedings, applications for security for costs, summary judgment hearings, costs budgeting, claims for declaratory relief, stays for arbitration, the disclosure pilot, and the trial of preliminary issues.

He has advised and acted for property owners, developers and designers on a significant number of cladding disputes post-Grenfell. He has worked on several claims arising from PFI agreements, principally those involving the maintenance of hospital buildings, often involving fire safety issues and wrongful termination claims.

He has considerable experience in transport infrastructure projects, a number of which have involved amended forms of the NEC form of contract. He is also a contributing author of Keating on NEC.

• Represented a steelwork subcontractor in a 2 week arbitration hearing concerning the final account for works at Abu Dhabi International Airport.

• Represented the contractor in a 4 week arbitration hearing in the UK concerning the final account for the concurrent construction of three energy from waste facilities.

• Represented the designer in an 4-week ICC arbitration hearing concerning the final account and professional negligence allegations arising out of the design construction of the Riyadh metro system.

• Advised the main contractor on subcontract issues concerning HS2.

• Advised the main contractor on its entitlement to extensions of time in a drill and blast tunnelling project associated with the XRL Hong Kong to China railway.

• Represented the main contractor in adjudication proceedings relating to the Northern Line tube extension to Battersea.

• Represented the main contractor against the Welsh Government in an arbitration for additional sums under a contract for the dualling of the A465 bordering the Brecon Beacons.

• Represented the steelwork contractor in arbitration proceedings related to a new airport terminal in the UAE.

• Represented the main contractor in a final account dispute with the employer over the construction of a highway in Qatar.

His work on more traditional construction projects is too extensive to list but recent examples include:

• Proceedings for declaratory relief for a housing and associated infrastructure development in North London.

• A final account dispute for the construction of the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world.

• Adjudication proceedings arising out of the refurbishment of the Palace of Westminster.

• A professional negligence claim associated with the backfilling of a quarry and the subsequent construction of a housing development near Corby.

• Advising on the contractual and tortious responsibilities arising out of the design and construction of cladding of tall buildings in the UK.

• Claims associated with the construction of baggage handling systems in Stansted and Gatwick.

He also has significant experience of disputes arising of FEED and EPC contracts associated with pharmaceutical and chemical production facilities including the various forms of contract issued by IChemE. Projects have included the design, construction, and commissioning of:

• An LDPE plant in North East England.

• A cannabis processing facility in Kent.

• A facility to produce Ethylene Di Chloride.

For other examples of work see the Energy and Offshore Construction headings.

Thomas has considerable experience in professional negligence actions associated with construction and engineering projects. He has advised both claimants and professionals on the scope and standard of care owed under contract and in tort. He is comfortable with and enjoys claims that involve technical issues from complex steelwork design to engineering issues associated with the design and commissioning of power plants and drilling rigs. He regularly advises on the meaning and effect of clauses that exclude or limit the potential liability of construction professionals.

His recent experience of professional negligence claims includes:

• The production of a FEED report for the development and refurbishment of an oil platform in the North Sea.

• The production of a FEED report and management of an EPC contract for various pharmaceutical and chemical processing facilities.

• The design, supervision, and approval of backfilling works at a quarry for the construction of a housing development near Corby.

• The design of the elevated stations for the Riyadh Metro System.

• The design defects in the steelwork for an energy-from-waste plant in London.

• The thermal design of a residential housing development as part of the development around Arsenal’s new stadium.

Most of the work listed under Offshore Construction and Marine Engineering has been in the context of an international arbitration, as have all of the international projects mentioned under the other categories above.

Thomas is happy to travel as necessary to deal with his cases. His work has involved projects around the globe including:

• Shipbuilding disputes in China, South Korea and Germany.

• Disputes concerning offshore oil and gas production facilities in the Gulf of Mexico, Angola, Argentina, Nigeria and the North Sea.

• Infrastructure and other building projects in Hong Kong, Saudi Arabia, Dubai and Qatar.

In order to develop his understanding of the various procedural issues involved in international arbitration, he obtained a Diploma in International Arbitration in 2013 and has been a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators since 2015.