Citation: 126 ConLR 118, [2009] EWHC 2022 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 17 (Aug)
Nature of case: By a contract evidenced in writing, the first respondent (“Capital”) engaged the claimant (“Windglass”) to supply and install glazed windows, doors and screens at a site known as City Link Court, London. The second respondent (“LCGH”) is Capital's parent company. The contract did not contain an adequate mechanism for determining either what interim payments became due under the contract or when they became due for payment. Accordingly, certain terms were implied into the contract pursuant to Part II of The Scheme for Construction Contracts (SI 1998/649).
