Citation: BLR 395 CA
Nature of case: Following earlier reported litigation on the significance of contractual performance tests on an allegedly defective sewage treatment works, the appellants sought to argue that the first instance judge’s decision was substantially wrong on fact and law. The Court of Appeal held that the appeal was simply not viable unless the claimant/appellant was allowed to re-open large parts of the judge’s findings.
See other reports: [2005] EWCA Civ. 894 LAWTEL CA [2004] BLR 409 TCC [2003] 90 Con LR 115 TCC [2003] 90 Con LR 86 TCC
